Won't deferring the individual mandate be a fiscal time bomb? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 03:22:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Won't deferring the individual mandate be a fiscal time bomb? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Won't deferring the individual mandate be a fiscal time bomb?  (Read 4785 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« on: October 03, 2013, 12:09:39 PM »

Perhaps that is exactly what the Republicans want. A disaster. Then they can claim that it was Obama's fault. The Republican right now is really, really disgusting. And I am being nice.
^^^^^^^^^
Torie, your point is the entire Republican objective. I know that, due to our frequent differences of opinion (and my often brusque tone), you may be inclined to take what I say with a large grain of salt. But seriously. This is all there is to it.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2013, 02:52:11 PM »

Buying insurance is a loss for the average person. That's true. True for life, auto, home, health insurances. The trick is that your life is not average. You have a sample size of one, and you have to protect your life as best you can. That's why people buy all forms of insurance. To manage their risk. I thought that would go without saying, but apparantly not.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.