Is a national primary campaign smart after all? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 08:09:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is a national primary campaign smart after all? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is a national primary campaign smart after all?  (Read 1105 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« on: November 14, 2011, 09:20:39 PM »

There's no excuse why one state should have that much influence over the Presidential selection process. Full stop. That Iowa (and New Hampshire as well) lacks the whole nation's diversity is another compunding problem. And they have tried to address it in the most half-assed way possible, by giving SC and NV second billing. I honestly don't know why either political party doesn't move to national primary. It would be great spin to say "My party thinks that every American ought to have equal vote. Evidently, the other doesn't."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.