Illinois People: Why Hasn't Mike Madigan Tried for Higher Office? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 05:58:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Illinois People: Why Hasn't Mike Madigan Tried for Higher Office? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Illinois People: Why Hasn't Mike Madigan Tried for Higher Office?  (Read 1049 times)
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
« on: March 15, 2017, 05:14:38 PM »
« edited: March 15, 2017, 05:18:15 PM by Rjjr77 »

You said it yourself. Leaving the speakership, even for a higher office, could only lessen the power he currently has.

True now, but why not in like the 90s when he wasn't an absolute juggernaut? For such a megalomaniac on a small scale, he certainly has had to have at least thought about it, so I'm wondering why he decided to stay Speaker instead of trying to be, I don't know, Senate Majority Leader or dare I say, President?

He's always been a juggernaut. The guys controlled Springfield since 1983

He even forces the university of Illinois into accepting applicants backed by him.
Logged
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2017, 05:27:55 PM »

Also speaker is way more powerful than senate majority leader
Logged
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2017, 05:52:21 PM »

You said it yourself. Leaving the speakership, even for a higher office, could only lessen the power he currently has.

True now, but why not in like the 90s when he wasn't an absolute juggernaut? For such a megalomaniac on a small scale, he certainly has had to have at least thought about it, so I'm wondering why he decided to stay Speaker instead of trying to be, I don't know, Senate Majority Leader or dare I say, President?

Why would he give up the certainty of absolute power in Springfield for the US Senate, where he would only be one of a hundred Senators? Working his way up the Senate hierarchy to Majority Leader is no sure thing, especially since it also relies on his party (and him!) consistently winning elections to keep him in the spot.

Compare that to his current situation: he will always be comfortably re-elected (which wouldn't be true if he were Senator or Governor—as Green Line mentioned, he's deeply unpopular outside of his district), he will always retain the job of Speaker (nobody would be foolish enough to try to challenge him), and Illinois will always elect enough Democrats to the House to keep him in power.
Except for two blissful years in the 1990s.
Logged
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2017, 10:01:25 PM »

I like Speaker Madigan's style sometimes, it's brash, but I think he has the stench of corruption.

If you honestly like him you don't know anything about him, he's a corrupt thug who holds the state hostage. He's literally the only person in politics that made people think Blagojevich was reasonable.
Logged
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2017, 01:32:51 AM »

I like Speaker Madigan's style sometimes, it's brash, but I think he has the stench of corruption.

If you honestly like him you don't know anything about him, he's a corrupt thug who holds the state hostage. He's literally the only person in politics that made people think Blagojevich was reasonable.
Did Madigan and Blagojevich get along?

No, they hated each other.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.