Why were people writing Fetterman off so bluntly near the end? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:38:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why were people writing Fetterman off so bluntly near the end? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were people writing Fetterman off so bluntly near the end?  (Read 2382 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,292
United States


P P P
« on: November 22, 2022, 10:06:48 AM »

The polling trends and assumptions about the national environment favored Oz, and coverage of the debate seemed to help him as well.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,292
United States


P P P
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2022, 08:36:09 PM »

For me it was all the fake polls that flooded the discourse in that last month. I changed my prediction about a week before the election in both Pennsylvania and Arizona Senate to favor the Republicans.

Conventional wisdom still had Kelly winning. But most people also thought Laxalt would win NV, and while a runoff in GA was considered more likely than not it was expected that Walker would lead the first round.

We also saw this with Hassan's race. And in the governor's races a lot of people believed that Whitmer was now in a dead heat with Dixon.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,292
United States


P P P
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2022, 08:41:33 PM »

For me it was all the fake polls that flooded the discourse in that last month. I changed my prediction about a week before the election in both Pennsylvania and Arizona Senate to favor the Republicans.

Conventional wisdom still had Kelly winning. But most people also thought Laxalt would win NV, and while a runoff in GA was considered more likely than not it was expected that Walker would lead the first round.

We also saw this with Hassan's race. And in the governor's races a lot of people believed that Whitmer was now in a dead heat with Dixon.

Masters was leading the final polling average.

I don't remember Masters ever leading a polling average. Maybe it was RCP, because he definitely never led on 538.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,292
United States


P P P
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2022, 10:58:42 PM »

For me it was all the fake polls that flooded the discourse in that last month. I changed my prediction about a week before the election in both Pennsylvania and Arizona Senate to favor the Republicans.

Conventional wisdom still had Kelly winning. But most people also thought Laxalt would win NV, and while a runoff in GA was considered more likely than not it was expected that Walker would lead the first round.

We also saw this with Hassan's race. And in the governor's races a lot of people believed that Whitmer was now in a dead heat with Dixon.

Oh?

Yeah I meant fake polls showing Whitmer and Dixon roughly tied.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.