If no states used commissions, what maps would we see? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 05:18:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  If no states used commissions, what maps would we see? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If no states used commissions, what maps would we see?  (Read 562 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,189
United States


P P P
« on: February 27, 2022, 11:08:07 PM »

What maps would we see if no states used commissions to draw their maps?
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,189
United States


P P P
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2022, 09:59:58 PM »

California, Colorado, and New Jersey would be dem manders each with two republicans

NJ isn't too far off from what a Dem gerrymander would be. It was a purposeful decision to weaken Malinowski to shore up Sherill and Gottheimer. And Malinowski's seat is still Biden +4.

There used to be dreams of drawing out Van Drew, but I doubt a Democrat will be elected there for a long time.


What would an actual Gerrymander look like?
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,189
United States


P P P
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2022, 06:23:34 PM »

NJ probably wouldn’t have to get rid of Tom Malinowski. They’d just unpack NJ-12 instead.

AZ is probably more aggressive. Greg Stanton might get a vote sink while Schweikert is shored up.

CA probably takes out every Republican except for LaMalfa, McCarthy, and a few others. Garcia’s seat dips deeper south into very blue parts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.