Were “Dean or bust” people blamed for Kerry loosing? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 03:59:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Were “Dean or bust” people blamed for Kerry loosing? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Were “Dean or bust” people blamed for Kerry loosing?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Were “Dean or bust” people blamed for Kerry loosing?  (Read 3440 times)
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,901
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

« on: March 11, 2020, 04:11:48 AM »

Some did, but the Dean coalition was different from the 2016 Sanders coalition in being far more upscale. Dean did miserably through 2003-2004 among working-class Democrats of all races, and many polls showed him weaker than Kerry against Bush. His voters were mostly the "latte liberal" crowd, many of whom later voted for Hillary over Sanders.

This.

My uncle was a Deaniac at the time & even he admitted that, in retrospect, Kerry was definitely the better candidate. A lot of progressive firebrands were caught into the groupthink of the early netroots internet activism & missed that Dean was actually the latte liberal candidate & that Kerry had the support of the working-class base of the party & was actually giving rabble-rousing populist stump-speeches to blue-collar workers in NH. And yes, you heard me right: Kerry gave rabble-rousing speeches!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 15 queries.