I don't think it would be too smart for the Democrats to pick someone who would turn off most of their base to be their keynote speaker.
Unlike the Republican Party, Democrats can--and should--afford ignoring their base. Thats how we got Bill Clinton. When they listen to their base, we get McGovern...and Hillary / Obama.
Bill Clinton and Ben Nelson are hardly comparable.
Because obviously having an unpopular mayor who supports drug legalisation as the face of the Democratic party is really going to appeal to middle America. Why not have go the whole hog and have Elliott Spitzer up on the podium as well?
Because having a candidate who is black and named Barack Hussein Obama is really going to appeal to middle America. Who would ever let THAT guy give the keynote address?!?!? He wouldn't stand a chance!
To imply that Cory Booker is in any way similar to Eliot Spitzer is ridiculous and a pretty uneducated statement to make. Booker stands for everything that Spitzer is not.
Booker has made it clear that he believes that certain drug penalties are filling up prisons that should be filled with murderers, something that he knows all too well living in Newark. Booker is also pretty moderate and has views that would be more in line with middle America than some views that some Democratic politicians endorse.
He's a rising star in politics today and to simply write him off as out of touch is foolish.