DRA stuff (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 03:49:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  DRA stuff (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DRA stuff  (Read 34916 times)
Pennsylvania Deplorable
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532


« on: December 11, 2017, 05:01:23 PM »

Are they going to get the other states soon?
Logged
Pennsylvania Deplorable
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532


« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2017, 12:32:07 AM »


I was just checking this today, and then saw your post. Since this map was created, NY, FL, and IL have had data added to then. CA at the time of this maps creation only had 12/16 data for it's useless voting districts data (the version with 200,000 pop tracts that is not used by anyone but the census) and now has 12/16 data for the block groups (the one with 2008 data, and with actual precincts).

It is quite possible we never get the at-large states, or get them all last, since the congressional PVIs are the same in their cases as the well known state PVIs.

Ugh, I hope all the states get data.  Sometimes, it is fun to mess around with seeing what would happen if states had more seats than they actually did.
Exactly what I was doing. I wanted to know if Montana got a second district (which could soon happen), would both be red? I think the western part of the state including Missoula would probably just lean red while the eastern district would be as red as it gets.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.