Are the 2016 election results now more controversial than the 2000 results (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:08:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Are the 2016 election results now more controversial than the 2000 results (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are the 2016 election results now more controversial than the 2000 results  (Read 1835 times)
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,265
United States


« on: December 26, 2017, 09:19:50 PM »

The Bush v. Gore decision was much worse than just "controversial." That decision by the SCOTUS convinced me that Republicans do not appoint better SC Justices than the Democrats. And that decision also convinced me that I did not want to vote any more. I did not vote in any elections from 2003 to 2015 inclusive because of Bush v. Gore.

But I can't say which election was more controversial. On the one hand 2000 was awful because of the SCOTUS sticking its nose where it did not belong; one the other hand 2016 was awful because of the guy who got elected.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.