Matt Taibbi something something Hunter Biden

[Hindsight was 2020]

Already thread got a thread for this 😉
https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=338687.msg6997154#msg6997154

[Hindsight was 2020]

I’ve mentioned this before but the Hunter story wasn’t “suppressed”, NYP wrote about it, Fox talked about it nonstop, and Trump even brought it up at the debates. This story was known to the public during the election. What Taibbi and the Trumpers obsessed with this story is mad about is that Twitter didn’t like bot and trolls spam about it nonstop on Twitter and dominate the discourse the way they did in 16 with the emails. And that is the hypocrisy of it all because Taibbi go to talking point during Russiagate was the idea that bots and trolls spamming Twitter could of influenced the public and hurt Hillary was absurd. Yet here he is now admitting he does think that Twitter spamming of can influence the public

[Hindsight was 2020]

Serious question here.... And I admit my ignorance/lack of background info on this as I haven't actually bothered reading the tweets put out by Musk and Taibbi b/c I value my sanity.

So, is the right's new claim of persecution/1A rights-supposedly-being-violated centered on the fact that they were not allowed by Twitter's previous management to distribute a picture of a man's penis online, when the man in question did not wish the picture to be put online? Do I have this right? Pre-Musk twitter stopped the GOP from committing revenge porn basically and they think this is a violation of free speech?

No the 1A violation is more about being able to spam Twitter about the story in general with bots and foreign assistance like they did in 16 over the dick picks in of itself