France shows her weakness once again (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:14:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  France shows her weakness once again (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: France shows her weakness once again  (Read 4990 times)
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

« on: August 19, 2006, 07:09:00 AM »

I read an article on the BBC site that many Germans are rather jittery about the hypothetical (if very, very unlikely) prospect of German- and Israeli soldiers pointing guns at each other. Apparently there's some history between the two.............

Btw, with regards to France, further down in the article MODU posted it states that they already have 1.700 troops in the region, so effectively they'd be bolstering it up to 1.900 as opposed to just sending 200.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2006, 11:35:32 AM »

I read an article on the BBC site that many Germans are rather jittery about the hypothetical (if very, very unlikely) prospect of German- and Israeli soldiers pointing guns at each other. Apparently there's some history between the two.............

Btw, with regards to France, further down in the article MODU posted it states that they already have 1.700 troops in the region, so effectively they'd be bolstering it up to 1.900 as opposed to just sending 200.

Is that supposed to be considered a huge commitment, commensurate with the level of world leadership to which France aspires?

Ha! No, definitely not, but I think there was some room for misinterpretation. 1.900 isn't much, but it's a lot more than 200.

Btw, does anybody know the total number of peacekeeping troops in the region?
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2006, 08:40:16 PM »
« Edited: August 30, 2006, 07:40:01 PM by Michael Z »

What happened was that terrorists kidnapped Israeli citizens.  The Israeli government demanded their return.  The terrorists (who operate in places like Lebanon) refused to return the kidnapped Israeli's.  Israel used legitimate force to deal with the terrorist (insufficent force in my opinion).

Yeah, bombing a whole country (a hitherto secular Muslim democracy lest I add), including airports, roads, warehouses, schools, and completely destroying its entire infrastucture because of a small cell based in its southern regions is a VERY LEGITIMATE way of dealing with terrorism, and one that will not turn the entire population against the attacking country and thus pave the way for more future conflicts.

I mean, look. I once had an Israeli girlfriend. My initial country's history was marred by the Holocaust. I know what these people feel like. But there is defending yourself and then there's bombing the crap out of a country for virtually no reason whatsoever. I cast myself back to the IRA comparison I made earlier. If the British had bombed the living daylights out of Belfast back in the 70s or 80s, how do you think things would be now?

Oh, and insufficent?! What should they have done? Nuke the place?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.