The election was not a low-turnout election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 01:01:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The election was not a low-turnout election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The election was not a low-turnout election  (Read 1665 times)
AN63093
63093
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 871


Political Matrix
E: 0.06, S: 2.17

« on: August 29, 2017, 02:53:46 AM »
« edited: August 29, 2017, 02:55:39 AM by AN63093 »

Nationally, you are correct.

However, turnout was down in some critical areas.  MI is a good example of this- Clinton was about 76k votes off of Obama from '12 in Detroit.  Now some of these voters may have flipped to Trump, but I would suspect not that many.  Trump's votes were only about 15k higher than Romney.

So even if every one of Trump's new voters flipped from Obama, that doesn't account for 60k votes.  For whatever reason, they didn't show.  Some of that would be accounted by the fact that Wayne County is losing population but it doesn't account for the entire 60k.

Had those voters showed up, MI would've gone D.

This is just one example.  So I think that although the election wasn't low turnout in general, it was lower in some key areas that may have lost the election for the Dems, and that's probably what gave birth to this myth.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.