4-year French presidential terms (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:01:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  4-year French presidential terms (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 4-year French presidential terms  (Read 3436 times)
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


« on: August 26, 2009, 04:48:52 PM »

Popular vote in 1962 and after ?

Do you need VPs ?

I'll carved out one list with your answers.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2009, 10:00:11 AM »
« Edited: September 22, 2009, 07:58:48 AM by big bad fab »

By referendum, in March 1962, presidential elections will be contested through universal suffrage. De Gaulle immediately resigns (his term ends in December) and an election is set for May 1962.

1962
De Gaulle 41,5% - 64,1% winner
Pinay 18,3% - 35,9%
Thorez 17,7%
Defferre 9,1%
Schumann 6,5%
Bidault 6,2%
others 0,7%

The old right, opposed to the new trends of de Gaulle's presidency, succeeds in making the retired Pinay his candidate. He advocates a more economically liberal policy, a more European stance and a less presidential regime. He is not very clear on Algeria, being able to steal many votes from the far-right.
The PCF hesitates but finally put forward his leader, Thorez, whose personal manners and illness are exposed in a way that results in a bad national result for the PCF.
Mollet is forced to agree on the name of the young Defferre, who is unknown but is able to reach beyond SFIO's old and corrupt image.
Maurice Schumann is reluctantly candidate for the centre, but his old-style manner isn't very efficient.
Bidault is the "Algérie française" candidate, but his extremist speeches frighten many French people.

In the run-off, many Pinay voters, having understood that he can't win, prefer to vote for de Gaulle... But, furthermore, the PCF and even many other leftist voters are forced to abstain. Schumann isn't very clear and, contrary to the centrist party, doesn't appeal to vote for Pinay.

1966
De Gaulle 37,9% - 62,7% winner
Mitterrand 17,4% - 37,3%
Rochet 16,0%
Lecanuet 13,1%
Depreux 7,2%
Tixier Vignancour 5,8%
others 2,6%

Mitterrand isn't able to gather all the left behind him. Depreux, who makes a good score for the PSU, and another ailing PCF candidate aren't able, though, to prevent him from being in the 2nd round. Lecanuet, young and media favorite, is very competitive.
In the run-off, without any momentum on the left, Mitterrand is trounced.

1970
Pompidou 42,2% - 52,9% winner
Servan-Schreiber 22,8% - 47,1%
Duclos 20,0%
Savary 7,1%
Rocard 6,7%
others 1,2%

After the death of De Gaulle, an election is organized in December.
In the first round, a legitimacy effect plays well for Pompidou, but he has no reserve of votes.
Servan-Schreiber is able to grasp many centre-right and centre-left voters and a large chunk of the socialists who don't believe the new convert Alain Savary can be trusted. Savary is almost beaten by Rocard, his old pal in the PSA-PSU.
In the run-off, Pompidou does surprisingly well, dut to a momentum towards JJSS. But the communists fail to turn to vote for the latter en masse.

1974
Giscard d'Estaing 33,6% - 71,3% winner
Marchais 18,5% - 28,7%
Chaban-Delmas 17,3%
Mitterrand 11,4%
Servan-Schreiber 11,2%
Edgar Faure 6,5%
others 1,5%

Pompidou's death sets election in May again...
JJSS is unable to repeat his 1970 success, having been unable to organize a solid party. Besides, Edgar Faure acts as a Giscard proxy and steals many votes from JJSS. Mitterrand proposes many hard left proposals and loses votes to Servan-Schreiber and to Marchais, who is more moderate (for a communist) during his "eurocommunist" trend.
Chaban-Delams is betrayed by Chirac, Pasqua and even Guichard and fails to make it to the run-off.
Due to feras of communism and appeals from all the big candidates, except Mitterrand, to vote for him, Giscard is triumphantly elected.

1978
Rocard 29,4% - 53,7% winner
Giscard 26,1% - 46,3%
Peyrefitte 21,2%
Roland Leroy 13,8%
Dumont 5,5%
others 4,0%

Due to his aristocratic presidency and the Crisis, Giscard is weakened by a mediatic campaign from Peyrefitte (whom Chirac has pushed on the forefront), by a strong Michel Jobert candidacy (3,5%) and by the new moderateness of Rocard, which contrats well with the 1974 Mitterrand.
The bad result of the orthodox Roland Leroy precludes the PCF from being too noisy about Rocard's moderateness.
So, in the run-off, Rocard wins convincingly.

1982
Chirac 24,7% - 51,4% winner
Rocard 26,0% - 48,6%
Giscard d'Estaing 19,1%
Marchais 15,6%
Tazieff 6,1%
Le Pen 5,3%
others 3,2%

After an unsuccessful term and many attacks from the inside of his party, Rocard is just able to finish ahead of Chirac in the first round. The Green candidate, Haroun Tazieff, scores well and Le Pen too.
Giscard, outraged of having been ousted so easily in 1978, is again candidate but loses quite clearly.
In the run-off, Chirac's victory is difficult, but divisions on the left are a bit more harmful than those on the right.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2009, 10:56:34 AM »
« Edited: September 22, 2009, 07:58:05 AM by big bad fab »

1986
Rocard 28,8% - 52,0%
Chirac 23,9% - 48,0%
Fiterman 14,7%
Barrot 10,9%
Le Pen 9,8%
Noir 7,5%
others 4,4%

After a difficult term, during which his personal behaviour has been criticized and France has been unable to recover fully from the crisis, Chirac's result is bad in the first round.
Feeling the rise of Le Pen, he has to strenghten all his positions, resulting in the candidacy of Michel Noir, who is more moderate and is young and mild-mannered.
Fortunately for Chirac, the UDF candidate isn't an arch-enemy and Barrot isn't very strong in the medias.
In the run-off, despite unity on the right, Rocard comes back.

1990
Rocard 38,5% - 55,4%
Léotard 18,2% - 44,6%
Le Pen 13,6%
Chirac 9,4%
Séguin 8,8%
Ralite 8,1%
others 3,4%

With the economy buoying, Rocard sails to victory, against a divided right, Chirac trying again to be president and being humiliated by Le Pen. Séguin, as the social and nationalist gaullist, only manages to divide the right and even seems to support Rocard in the 2nd round by deriding personal abilities of Léotard.
The moderate line of the PCF since 1983 plays well for Riocard in the second round. He wins with a double-digit margin.

1994
Chirac 16,7% - 52,6%
Rocard 25,3% - 47,4%
Le Pen 16,0%
Balladur 14,4%
Chevènement 9,0%
Bosson 8,7%
Deniau 7,6%
others 2,3%

Among a divided right and centre-right, Chirac is able to beat Le Pen by a very small margin. Fortunately for him, Deniau, Bosson and Balladur gather around him and show a big united image.
Because of scandals inside the PS, of a big score from a reluctant Chevènement and of returning crisis, Rocard is eventually beaten by his old enemy.
It's more a defeat for the left than a big win for the right.

1998
Fabius 27,6% - 76,7%
Le Pen 16,9% - 23,3%
Chirac 15,8%
Bayrou 13,1%
Pasqua 9,3%
Voynet 6,4%
Laguiller 5,2%
others 5,7%

After a catastrophic term, Chirac is beaten by Le Pen and by divisions inside the right.
Bayrou, so sure to be in the second round, resigns from any political position.
In the run-off, there is no real contest and Fabius becomes the great saviour, even if Le Pen makes some progress, due to Pasqua' sympathy towards him.

2002
Juppé 24,3% - 53,2%
Fabius 24,3% - 46,8%
Le Pen 13,0%
Madelin 7,2%
Villiers 6,1%
Dutreil 6,1%
Lipietz 5,5%
Emmanuelli 5,4%
Laguiller 5,0%
others 3,1%

Even if the left and the right are divided, Juppé has the momentum: he is surprisingly high, Le Pen is down and the rest of the right is too divided to be harmful.
On the left, Lipietz is very reluctant to support Fabius and Emmanuelli attacks him even more than he fights against Juppé.
In the run-off, Juppé's very efficient campaign leads him to a convincing victory.

2006
Strauss-Kahn 27,7% - 50,2%
Juppé 26,1% - 49,8%
Le Pen 13,2%
Raffarin 12,4%
Mélenchon 10,0%
Cohn-Bendit 7,3%
others 3,3%

Juppé hasn't made a bad term, but the mood is against him. Le Pen is still high. Cohn-Bendit steals some far-left voters and makes them available for Strauss-Kahn. Mélenchon divisive candidacy isn't so bad as it makes Besancenot eat the dust.
Juppé is narrowly beaten, in the closest election of the 5th Republic.

2010
Sarkozy 33,0% - 56,8%
Strauss-Kahn 23,9% - 43,2%
Baroin 11,1%
Borloo 9,1%
Le Pen 7,3%
Mélenchon 7,2%
Cochet 5,8%
others 2,6%

After the crisis, the left is in bad shape. Sarkozy manages to push Borloo in order to divide the natural electorate of Baroin. He makes a big result in the first round and gets the momentum. Mélenchon doesn't support Strauss-Kahn and gives no electoral instruction in the second round.
In the run-off, without any motivation, Strauss-Kahn almost drops and lets Sarkozy win with a big margin.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2009, 04:45:08 PM »


Well, less than in real life !
In my series, you've got 20 years of socialist presidents: 14 years in RL and 15 years of prime ministership...

But if you were talking about the number of candidates on the right, well, yes, a bit more than in RL Wink
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2009, 04:50:45 PM »


I haven't made it on purpose, but I knew a Marchais in the run-off would please you Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.