Sabato: Governors 2017-2018: The Democrats' Complicated Path to Big Gains (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 07:36:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Sabato: Governors 2017-2018: The Democrats' Complicated Path to Big Gains (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sabato: Governors 2017-2018: The Democrats' Complicated Path to Big Gains  (Read 2562 times)
TheSaint250
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,072


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: 5.22

P P
« on: August 17, 2017, 05:11:30 PM »
MI, CT, and ME should all be lean D. I'm still a little unsure about NM.

OK, AZ, TN, and GA should all be safe R.

OR should be safe D.

I'm also personally leaning towards MD being likely R.
Logged
TheSaint250
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,072


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: 5.22

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2017, 06:46:20 PM »
Quote from: AKCreative on August 17, 2017, 06:24:11 PM
Quote from: The Saint on August 17, 2017, 05:11:30 PM
MI, CT, and ME should all be lean D. I'm still a little unsure about NM.

OK, AZ, TN, and GA should all be safe R.

OR should be safe D.

I'm also personally leaning towards MD being likely R.

Why in the world would AZ be safe R?   That's nuts.

GA probably isn't realistic to call safe R either.
Ducey is pretty strong, and it doesn't seem like he'll attract a powerful opponent.  Deal is also very popular, and I just don't see Democrats winning the governorship.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.