The Church of England's big problem is it sounds like it tried to he the equivalent of Kyrsten Sinema in regards to all theological and political issues and thus ends up pleasing absolutely no one.
I'm not exactly sure what is meant by the reference to Krysten Sinema in this context, but the Church of England's self-conception as the via media is absolutely central to its tradition and even its theological legitimacy. Dunno what's left if one abandons that idea.
Also an established church needs to be a big tent, at least in theory. Not necessarily a fan of established churches but they are meant to be for all people in the nation.
Also I kind of agree with BRTD here, in the sense that if you want to re-name a church to "appeal more to young people" (which I think isn't that helpful but still), if it's still "St. [Name]'s Church of Bournemouth" you are not really changing the mental image people will have