''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 04:19:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy  (Read 7362 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70
« on: January 03, 2009, 05:15:46 PM »
No, eye for an eye  is a crude metric, but I do believe in the concept of retribution as a legitimate factor to include in the mix, and think retribution  cannot be wholly separated from the concept of justice.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.