Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 06:44:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4  (Read 180164 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,112
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: August 26, 2018, 11:59:25 AM »

NBC/WSJ

Approve - 46 (+2)
Disapprove - 51 (-1)


Taken entirely after Manafort/Cohen news.

This is the highest number I’ve seen for Trump in a live caller poll.

You did not provide a link to the poll. That is one of the rules I set for you. And so it took some work to find out your factual statement was false. So I am infracting this post as trolling. In addition, I want you to put up the dates during which the polling was done. Consider that another rule. Honestly, LL, you would be better off not participating in these polling threads. You have already been banned from doing it on the Congressional Board. You keep this up, and you will not be permitted to do it here either, either because Muon2 plays with the software to prevent it, or because I just start automatically deleting all of your posts on polling threads. LL, you are not taking me seriously, and that hurts my feelings.Sad
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,112
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2018, 12:17:16 PM »
« Edited: August 26, 2018, 12:23:29 PM by Torie »

I legitimately didn't read the rest of the write-up because I was in a rush... sorry. I think the way NBC presented it on social media was a bit confusing. I saw "Trump approval ratings steady after Cohen/Manafort", clicked, saw 46-51, and thought that was the only number. So I apologize.



OK, but you also forgot to provide the link, which is what resulted in the infraction. You should print out a list of all of the rules I set for you, so that when you "are in a rush" you don't slip up. I think there may have been a more recent poll published prior to the date you put up your poll with more negative numbers for Trump, which you didn't note, which would be an additional violation. The moral of the story, is that don't post here when in a rush. Rather, do it only when you have the time, and consider that given your history, it is like navigating through a minefield, so all the i's need to be dotted, and "t's crossed.

It would be easier for me to just tell you not to post on this thread at all. But I am trying to be fair to you, and give you a chance. I want you to stop being a high maintenance poster for me.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,112
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2018, 04:42:54 PM »

Gallup weekly:

Approve 41 (-1)
Disapprove 54 (+2)
Good to see numbers before the inevitable  NAFTA bump coming up. The Midwest will revert to 2016 levels from that victory.

I don't think the purpose of this thread is to predict how the numbers will change based on some current event. And by doing that, we get off topic and start arguing about what future numbers will be.
Heck we could get into pages of speculation because when it comes to Trump, there are just a veritable motherload of events that pertain to him (and if he is not in the news, he gets in the news by issuing another twitter message). So yeah, please take that somewhere else (you know, like to a board I don't moderate or something). Some might argue that the words "inevitable bump" are an example of extreme hyperbole, but no need to go there now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.