Sanders on breaking up banks: "I haven't personally studied that." (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:50:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Sanders on breaking up banks: "I haven't personally studied that." (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sanders on breaking up banks: "I haven't personally studied that."  (Read 1753 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: April 05, 2016, 08:55:48 AM »
« edited: April 05, 2016, 09:11:08 AM by Torie »

It's odd that Bernie is not up to speed on this, since this is his signature issue - the corruption of big finance.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2016, 09:21:03 AM »

Absolutely nothing Bernie wants to do that he outlined in the article will ever happen. He has no power to do any of it unilaterally despite his unsubstantiated asserted fantasies to the contrary, and Congress is certainly not going to go along with his agenda of financial and economic seppuku. Bernie in some ways sounds remarkably like Trump on these matters - not in style certainly, but he does on the substance.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2016, 10:15:15 AM »

...and Clinton has? She loves the way things are.
Yes. She studied it and realized it was a stupid and unworkable idea.

Hillary actually is quite informed on this set of issues. Maybe she has been bought off, as Bernie alleges, by Wall Street campaign contributions, but she is very well informed, and articulate in this area. That is my opinion.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2016, 02:18:32 PM »

It's not over-reacting at all. How can anyone honestly read that interview and think Bernie Sanders is even qualified to be a Senator, much less a President. Breaking up the big banks is the centerpiece of his campaign, and yet he's apparently given zero consideration to how he will do it, the consequences of doing so, the current law, etc.?? How is that acceptable? He doesn't even seem to be aware that MetLife and AIG are currently being broken up.

On trade, another centerpiece of his campaign, he's totally unable to articulate what specifics of trade agreements are bad and that he would change. He just says they're bad and he'd rewrite them. How is that acceptable? Opposition to these FTAs is like 1/3 of all this guy talks about and he is totally stumped when asked for specifics on how he'd revise them?? Come on.

I totally understand liking Bernie Sanders. I totally understand thinking he's an important progressive voice in our political system. But how can anyone read this interview and think he's prepared to be the President of the United States?

When it comes to your bolded question, one can have asked the same question with almost all of the candidates in the race this year. It's been that bad. Just awful. Clown after clown after clown, or in some cases, folks who clearly don't have "the necessaries," like Walker or Carson and on and on, and then the shrill dyspeptic extremist head case Cruz.

All things considered, when it comes to basic competence, we have or had Pataki, maybe fat boy Christie, Kasich, Graham and yeah with a bit of a leap of faith, perhaps Rubio, and yes, the liar Hillary. I think that is about it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.