Climate Change: The Burden of Proof

[Torie]

Here is the article. I am not qualified to further opine.

[Torie]

Torie, what will you and your ilk do when Fred Singer finally kicks the bucket?

Well, it's reassuring that you think I will outlast Singer.

I am just passing this on, for discussion purposes. Where's Snowguy? He might actually have something useful to say, because I certainly don't.

I do agree that the burden of proof thing misses the mark. The odds that global warming is a threat might be say 30%, and that may be enough depending on the severity of the consequences, to take action. So this is one instance, where a court of law legal approach is not really appropriate.

[Torie]

Sometimes Grump I think you post more images than words.

[Torie]

So if not CO2 generated, at least in the way the scientists think it would, what are the alternative theories, and evidence, as to why the surface is warming some, and more in the Arctic, than elsewhere?