Indian skeptic charged with 'blasphemy' for revealing a fake miracle (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 03:31:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Indian skeptic charged with 'blasphemy' for revealing a fake miracle (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Indian skeptic charged with 'blasphemy' for revealing a fake miracle  (Read 2365 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,092
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: June 14, 2012, 09:27:27 AM »
« edited: June 14, 2012, 09:30:15 AM by Torie »

The British can certainly blamed for stirring up religious hatred. They did not create it, but they did exploit it. Repeatedly.

I support the existence of these laws but it really should be used judiciously. This guy did not do this to fan anti-Christian fervor nor did he do this to provoke a violent reaction from Christians.

You don't favor a First Amendment for India sbane? Enforcing a law "judiciously" sounds like a recipe for enhancing government power, favoritism and abuse. That runs the risk of opening up Pandora's Box, as authorities decide what is PC, and what is not.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,092
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2012, 04:09:58 PM »
« Edited: June 14, 2012, 04:12:50 PM by Torie »

The US standard is that the speech has a clear and present immediate danger of hurting folks (I think it is called the "imminent harm" standard or something). What India is doing is a long way from that. And hate speech is protected in the US (Nazi's have a right to march in Jewish Skokie, Ill, which has or had a fair number of holocaust survivors), absent it falling into the clear and present danger zone. Heck under the India standard, a dozen posters here would be in legal danger for what they post about the LDS, don't you think? And how does one separate out what may be painful truths from hate?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.