MI-9: Rossman's Independent Polling: Raczkowski (R) 45% Peters (D) 40.7% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 08:03:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  MI-9: Rossman's Independent Polling: Raczkowski (R) 45% Peters (D) 40.7% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI-9: Rossman's Independent Polling: Raczkowski (R) 45% Peters (D) 40.7%  (Read 2116 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,103
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: September 17, 2010, 03:10:09 PM »
« edited: September 17, 2010, 03:14:57 PM by Torie »

MI-9: Rossman's Independent Polling:  Raczkowski (R) 45% Peters (D) 40.7%

Assuming this poll is real, the Dems are facing a wipeout in Michigan.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,103
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2010, 03:24:08 PM »

By 'wipeout' do you mean holding 5, 12, 13, 14, and 15 while losing 1, 7, and 9? Peters is a freshman elected in 2008 with 52%, this is a suburban district most likely affected by the tea party, and the PVI is only D +2; plus it's Michigan. Though the whole auto bailout probably plays well here.

Ya, although Dingell (you remember him?), is hounding the Dems for money because he thinks he might be in trouble.  That really would be a wipeout, because then the Dems are down to their two black seats, the Jewish seat (sort of), and the Flint seat. It can't go much lower than that.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,103
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2010, 03:51:46 PM »

Lossing 1, 7 and 9 would shift the state from 8-7 Dem to 10-5 Republican. A 2-1 Republican delegation in Michigan, (...) How is that not a wipeout for the Democrats? Shame Stabenow isn't up. Tongue
Sigh... 10-5 R with that map does not actually mean an R lead in the popular statewide vote. (As in, not necessarily.)

Yes, that is true actually. MI-9 is a couple of points more GOP than the state. I was surprised. I thought it GOP days of old had totally faded away. Apparently not quite. Still, if the Dems won the state while losing MI-9, it would not be by much in all probability. Now if Dingell goes down ...
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,103
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2010, 06:36:11 PM »

By 'wipeout' do you mean holding 5, 12, 13, 14, and 15 while losing 1, 7, and 9? Peters is a freshman elected in 2008 with 52%, this is a suburban district most likely affected by the tea party, and the PVI is only D +2; plus it's Michigan. Though the whole auto bailout probably plays well here.

Ya, although Dingell (you remember him?), is hounding the Dems for money because he thinks he might be in trouble.  That really would be a wipeout, because then the Dems are down to their two black seats, the Jewish seat (sort of), and the Flint seat. It can't go much lower than that.

Slightly off-topic, but the Jews have pretty much moved into this district, except (as can be the case elsewhere) some ultra-Orthodox Russians. But basically Levin's district is a UAW area shored up by a limb over to black Southfield via LGBT/generic "hip" liberal Ferndale.

(edit: by "this" I mean MI-9, the original thread topic, just to be clear).

Excellent points. And I forgot about the black Southfield salient, to anneal Levin's district.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 9 queries.