Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 46,108
![](./avatars/Democratic/INT_D_UA.gif)
Political Matrix E: -3.48, S: -4.70
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: December 01, 2009, 11:18:42 PM » |
|
|
« edited: December 01, 2009, 11:24:42 PM by Torie »
|
The major departure was not the number of US and NATO troops, but the bit about ramping up the Afghan army rapidly. From little I know, that seems sensible because Afghanistan is not Iraq, and much of its population is illiterate and something not far away from the stone age. In the background there may be a realization about cutting back the goals of the mission (no Bush, Afghanistan probably won't end up as the society either you or I would want), and that is quite wise I think.
The goal should be to secure the field to the point that it won't be used by nutters as a base. The end.
|