reagente
Atlas Politician
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,872
Political Matrix
E: 5.10, S: 4.96
|
 |
« on: March 26, 2024, 08:43:40 PM » |
|
Amicus Filing from Many Concerned Denizens Organized Nationally Against Low Down Scoundrels (MCDONALDS) in support of petitioner:
The court should reject Dwarven Dragon's reasoning, as he has advanced a concocted word salad that makes a mockery of our constitution and attempts to have it both ways.
Despite such text appearing nowhere in the Constitution, Dwarven Dragon attempts to claim that "shall be filled through appointment by the executive of the former Senator’s Party" should instead read "shall be filled through appointment by the executive of the former Senator’s Party [provided it was a major party at the resignation]". If this is true, why is it the case that the appointment would not be made by the executive at the time of the vacancy, which was ReallySuper, both as party founder and under the de facto officer doctrine? If the text implies that major party status is at time of resignation, why does it not also imply appointment is made by the party executive at time of resignation?
|
