SB 9103: Close the Regional Change Loophole Act of 2019

[YE]

Anyone? It's nearing 3 days.

I strongly support this because I'm not a fan of moving hopping in general. I realize moving hoping is probably more necessary than with 3 regions than 5 for strategic reasons (let's keep it real, moving regions is largely strategic and there is published proof of this - it was discussed in the logs released by a radical who use to serve as vice president back in the day), but it risks inbalance to the game. Right now, it's skewing all the political energy towards Fremont (which I guess was helpful for me politically but that doesn't make it right) and leaving the other two regions ignored (TM to his credit has kept the South afloat to a large extent but I can't say I'm happy with the dire straights Lincoln has been in given they have a stupid and useless bloated cabinet, no bills on the wiki, yet just 3 legislators).

[YE]

Anyone? It's nearing 3 days.

I strongly support this because I'm not a fan of moving hopping in general. I realize moving hoping is probably more necessary than with 3 regions than 5 for strategic reasons (let's keep it real, moving regions is largely strategic and there is published proof of this - it was discussed in the logs released by a radical who use to serve as vice president back in the day), but it risks inbalance to the game. Right now, it's skewing all the political energy towards Fremont (which I guess was helpful for me politically but that doesn't make it right) and leaving the other two regions ignored (TM to his credit has kept the South afloat to a large extent but I can't say I'm happy with the dire straights Lincoln has been in given they have a stupid and useless bloated cabinet, no bills on the wiki, yet just 3 legislators).

There were a couple of times when moves were necessitated to revive a region. Truman moving to Fremont as I recall just prior to becoming FM and also pre-reset, Lumine moved back to the Pacific to become Senator because there was likely literally no one else in the region to do it at the time as I recall (at least no one who wasn't batsh@%T crazy and there were a lot of them floating around in July 2015).

That's true. Maybe we should give Congress the ability to add an exception in those necessary cases (particularly the Truman one since that required Congressional intervention, the Pacific one is less likely to be repeated post-reset)?

[YE]

In answer to Sestak’s question, yes.

[YE]

Can someone formally introduce said amendment?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

SEC. III. IMPLEMENTATION.
1. This Act shall take effect immediately upon its passage.[/quote][/quote]

[YE]

24 hours to object to the amendment above.

[YE]

24 hours to object to the amendment above.

technically I should be calling that, but yeah. 24 hours.

For a second I thought this was a VP administered slot

[YE]

This needs a new sponsor.

[YE]

Lots of voting going on I see.