Japan and the willing support of other nations can manage fission for all to benefit from but, a tsunami, the earthquake ro-bo-dope… attention all earthlings living within the shores of the sea, move NOW! Unless, you enjoy living and consuming energy doing all the things that one does --- is it worth the risk? ...absolutely, but,
there is a solution for electricity in abundance without fossil, fission/fusion, solar, wind or wave… think of, a mid-evil carnival ride and 100% employment... world wide.
Let me try:
Japan and a lot of other countries can use nuclear power for the benefit of their people, sure, but look at what happened after the one-two punch of the earthquake and tsunami! Everyone who lives near the coastline, you better move or you might be in danger yourself!!* Is it worth the risk to keep using nuclear power, in spite of the dangers? Sure, I suppose. But I have a better idea to generate the electricity we need in order to maintain our standard of living, without relying on any of the conventional methods: imagine, if you will, a giant contraption resembling a Medieval carnival ride, where any number of humans can toil away to convert the mechanical energy from their bodies into electricity! By switching to this method of electricity generation we can have unlimited access to clean and affordable energy, and, as an added bonus, permanently eliminate unemployment worldwide**.
*: I'm uncertain if this remark is intended to be a hyperbolic jest directed at anti-nuclear fearmongers, or the expression of a genuine belief that the Earth's oceans are now irrevocably tainted by radiation in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. My translation attempts to maintain neutrality regarding which of the two was t_host's intended point.
**: I think he's probably joking here but I'm honestly not sure?
