Which of the following elections do you think were "stolen"? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 04:24:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Which of the following elections do you think were "stolen"? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Vote for each election where you think the winning candidate's victory was illegitimate.
#1
Florida Presidential Election, 2000
 
#2
Ohio Presidential Election, 2004
 
#3
Minnesota Senate Election, 2008
 
#4
South Dakota Senate Election, 2002
 
#5
Washington Gubernatorial Election, 2002
 
#6
Alabama Gubernatorial Election, 2002
 
#7
New Hampshire Dem. Presidential Primary, 2008
 
#8
New Mexico Dem. Presidential Primary, 2008
 
#9
None of the above
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of the following elections do you think were "stolen"?  (Read 1435 times)
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

« on: November 19, 2011, 03:27:39 PM »

These are all the elections since 2000 where I can remember someone accusing the winning side of stealing it. What do you think?

Also, feel free to mention any other recent elections that are considered questionable by someone.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2011, 05:41:38 AM »
« Edited: November 20, 2011, 05:44:53 AM by Bacon King, VP »

New Mexico 2008 Democratic caucus seemed kind of sketchy, but Washington 2008 GOP caucus was more obviously stolen:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=70234.0

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=70313.0


Oh yeah! Totally forgot about that one.


Outside of this forum, I don't know if anyone else noticed how sketchy NM was being with releasing their results. You can look back on the 2008 board and see who was claiming it, probably, if you're interested.

There was a bit of a ruckus after the New Hampshire primary, though. The blogosphere made a big deal about how NH towns with paper ballots voted for Obama, while towns with Diebold machines voted for Hillary. There was enough of a controversy that Dennis Kucinich decided to spend the last bit of his campaign cash on paying for the first half of a statewide recount.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.