What would realistically be the most electable Democratic or Republican ticket? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 08:07:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  What would realistically be the most electable Democratic or Republican ticket? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would realistically be the most electable Democratic or Republican ticket?  (Read 1882 times)
politics_king
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,591
United States


« on: January 24, 2017, 04:41:12 AM »

Kamala Harris/Al Franken, if we're doing off electability. It's really unifying the party together with a ticket like that, but American politics has shown it's hard to pull this one off. Trump though was such a big personality he could've nominated anyone for VP, but he wanted to make sure he had part of a base that didn't trust by going with Mike Pence, he wanted Christie. The Establishment in the Democratic party still holds that gravitas because most American's are centrist when it comes to economics while socially it's skewing toward the left.
Logged
politics_king
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,591
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2017, 08:10:12 AM »

Assuming Trump is the Repub nom...
Some combo like:

Sherrod Brown/ Julian Castro
Al Franken/ Kamala Harris
Cory Booker/ (Heinrich or Brown)

... it think it will be smart to have some Geographical Diversity on the ticket & Someone from the SW (which is why I included Castro, Heinrich, Harris (although CA isn't exactly SW.. she would have SW appeal)

... although of the list above- Brown & Franken will be 69.... which make me hesitant (I think there is something to the stat that in modern era- every Dem elected President have been under 54 yrs old!) .. so Maybe switch the order (as older Dem candidates have been fine as VP picks)

If Trump is a total failure, it just has to be the polar opposite of him. Most Dems are, but the message has to consistent with our values. We're a conservative economic country, but socially acceptable.
Logged
politics_king
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,591
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2017, 10:17:04 AM »

Assuming the Republican nominee is either Trump or Pence, I can see John Hickenlooper or Steve Bullock giving them a really hard time. For a running mate, there is several possibilities : Sherrod Brown or Elizabeth Warren if they want a liberal anti-Wall Street appeal, John Bel Edward if they want to court conservative blue-dogs democrats, Kirsten Gillibrand if they want to run up the urban turnout. A good idea would be to have a Hispanic running mate, but I can't see anyone. Ruben Gallego is too young and inexperienced, Raul Grijalva is old.

If neither Trump nor Pence runs, I can see a John Kasich/Cory Gardner ticket, going for the "elder statesman/sensible conservative" message.

I don't think you could run Hickenlooper or Bullock against Trump, you don't want a contrast that is considered "close". But it depends on how Trump runs the country, if he does decent and people trend upwards in Approval then it's a moot point it'll be like Clinton vs. Dole. You want a polar opposite and a polar opposite will win the nomination because Trump's policies have been bad for America. If his policies work, I won't even be against him but I won't vote for him. I'll never support a man who tapped into the worst parts of his party to get elected.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.