Is Kirsten Gillibrand the most electable female democrat in 2020?

[60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED]

Gillibrand is a poor man's Hillary Clinton (and Booker is a poor man's Obama).

Not to mention she's super boring. Her speeches could compete with ambien.

[60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED]

So Atlas has agreed to Gillibrand - Clinton, Booker - Obama, but who is Harris and Warren?

Harris is a wanna be Obama:

- Mixed race
- From a blue state with a ton of electoral votes
- One term but it's not even finished
- Would be first female President

There are a few differences: she's too old (Harris will be 56 in 2020; Obama was 47 in 2008), she's not as great a speaker and less likable compared to Obama.

Warren is a joke lol. A punch line.

[60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED]

. It'll be interesting to see if she gets another mega-landslide reelection in 2018.

What did you mean by this lol?

She'll likely win 80-20 in 2018.

[60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED]

. It'll be interesting to see if she gets another mega-landslide reelection in 2018.

What did you mean by this lol?

She'll likely win 80-20 in 2018.

Gillibrand 72%
Long 26%

This is what I mean. Gillibrand even won rock-ribbed Republican Hamilton County.

But this is not only expected but virtually guaranteed. Are you saying if she only wins something like 55-45 or 58-40 or something like that then she has no chance in 2020?

[60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED]

I think there's a huge difference between the way Gillibrand and Clinton approach their femininity. Clinton was always one to try and downplay it as much as possible. She took very very hawkish positions on foreign policy for example. She tried to remove any doubt within voters minds that she was a "weak" woman. I don't think that ended up working out for her, as she came across in many's minds as condescending or snobbish. Gillibrand on the other hand seems to embrace that more mom-like aspect of herself. I was very anti-Gillibrand up until I read that one interview with her where she talks about her life as a mother. I thought it was extremely humanizing and made her far more relatable than Clinton. She has a really strong "family values" appeal that I think could put her in sharp contrast with Trump.

No one cares about "femininity." People will vote for a good leader whether it's a male or female.