If Andy Beshear were pro-life he'd have won by a 10 pt margin instead of <1.
Lol. This reminds me of when all the polls showed Doug Jones losing to Moore in the AL Senate race....everyone claimed Doug Jones would of been leading if he was pro-life and then he won anyway.
Issue voting is a myth. The idea that Beshear would of won by 10% if he was pro-life is ludicrous. A recent poll by Marist found that 71% of New Yorkers think abortion should only be legal up until 20 weeks yet Cuomo just passed a bill legalizing up till 9 months. Does anyone on here really think that this will cause the Dems to suffer losses in the state?
But then again, what makes abortion such an special issue in that it swings votes while other issues rated higher in importance by the voters themselves according to polling have no effect? We are repeatedly told how health care is the most important issue and how it lost the GOP the House in 2018(well except all those victories in 2010 and 2014 when the GOP voted to repeal ACA 80 times). Do any Conservatives on this site really think that Rs will lose power in Red states because of their position on healthcare or let's say gun control bills that 90% of the voters support? These are positions that the voters themselves list in higher importance in polling than abortion.
Just because an issue is important to you or is claimed to be of importance by the policy creating elite does not mean that they are held to any actual importance by the voting public or that they swing elections. I get that people on this site want a simple cause and effect explanation for election outcomes but just simply chalking it up to muh abortion doesnt make it true. The explanations on this site for election outcomes are like R L Stine's "Choose your own Adventure" books: If they lose, its cuz of abortion, if its close....it wouldn't of been close cuz of abortion, if they win....its cuz abortion mattered but not enough.