Democrats should campaign in the rust belt instead of the sun belt in 2020 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:08:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Democrats should campaign in the rust belt instead of the sun belt in 2020 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats should campaign in the rust belt instead of the sun belt in 2020  (Read 1596 times)
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,116


« on: December 16, 2017, 07:42:33 PM »

Well Democrats love grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory. Personally I think it'd be silly to not focus on both regions. There's going to be competitive Senate races in the Sun Belt, and if the gains in voter registrations since 2016 alone os any indication, neglecting Georgia would be retarded. After all, there's only about a dozen true battleground states if you combine both regions, so i don't know why you'd fight on a restricted field of only half a dozen instead.
Agreed, and even if they lose the Sun Belt, it is still worth the investment as these states will be key part of the Democratic coalition in a generation.

Obviously the main states will be MI, WI, PA, FL, NH, OH, IA, NV with the second tier states being NC, MN, AZ, GA, and ME

ETA: I forgot to add VA, but there's no way in hell Trump is winning this state so nevermind.
Why would Iowa be a first tier state when Trump won it by 10 points, yet Arizona is a second tier state when he only won it by 3?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.