Why 39.6%? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 04:24:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why 39.6%? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why 39.6%?  (Read 717 times)
GP270watch
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,729


« on: March 16, 2024, 03:45:21 PM »
« edited: March 16, 2024, 03:51:52 PM by GP270watch »

The top rate of federal income tax was set at 39.6% many years ago; I can't remember when exactly, but definitely by the time of Bush's 2001 tax cuts. It's been there ever since, except under the TCJA regime where it's been at 37%. There have been calls from various Democrats to pre-emptively restore the old rate and Joe Biden stated it again in his latest budget.

Why is a 39.6% top rate of tax such a totemic figure for Democrats, above - and notwithstanding - their support for TCJA expiry? What is achieved at 39.6% taxation that 39%, 39.5%, 40%, or even 39.9% would not achieve? Why was it even set there in the first place?

It was a newly created bracket in 1993 under Clinton along with 36%. But there were much higher top tax brackets, Reagan cut the top tax bracket from 70% at the start of his presidency to 28%. Whenever the United States fought wars or had an economic shock one of the first things Congress and the President would do was raise the top tax rate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.