Coons holds a Safe D seat and opposes ending the filibuster. That's reason enough to replace him.
I'm also for ending the filibuster, but opposing he doesn't deserve to be opposed over that one issue. It's the my way or the highway mentality on both sides, especially the right, but also the left, that makes Washington so dysfunctional.
"One issue"? It's the most important issue of them all, seeing as though with it still in place Democrats can expect to get literally no legislation passed. It's unbelievable that somebody can spend that long in congress and not know this, which raises the serious possibility that he is lying about supporting various democratic policies and is just hiding behind the filibuster as an excuse to avoid having to vote against popular Democratic legislation. Either way, whether born of some neurotic attachment to civility, wilful ignorance, a disqualifiying amount of obtuseness, or a desire to hide his political positions, for him to remain pro filibuster in late 2019 reflects badly on him.
