Why did New Jersey go so strongly for Gore? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 11:33:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did New Jersey go so strongly for Gore? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did New Jersey go so strongly for Gore?  (Read 3010 times)
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264
« on: November 07, 2017, 03:01:27 PM »
From what I can tell, Bush failed to win over New Jersey independents and moderates. Also Bill Clinton was still a popular president.
Logged
Metalhead123
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 264
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2017, 09:41:53 AM »
Quote from: darklordoftech on November 07, 2017, 08:03:08 PM
Quote from: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) on November 07, 2017, 04:33:04 PM
a lot of voters at the time didn't think there was much difference between the two
Shouldn't that benefit both candidates equally?
I think it would hinder them. Having two candidates who are viewed as the same could lead to more votes for a third party or lower turnout than normal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.