SR 113-67: Adequate Consideration Resolution (Passed)

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Aye

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Aye on R's amendment

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Proposed amendment. 24 hours to object.

...


5. ) Any bill that seeks to repeal two (2) or more federal laws adopted after June 1, 2016 in the same bill shall not be able to be brought to a final vote without a two-thirds vote of the whole Senate. Any bill that seeks to amend two (2) or more federal laws adopted after June 1, 2016 in the same bill shall not be able to be brought to a final vote without a two-thirds vote of the whole Senate. This rule shall expire ninety (90) days after the date of enactment.

You've just confirmed this is literally designed to stall reform efforts in the next session, and only the next session, of the Senate. I see no legitimate reason why the next class of democratically elected officials should be denied the same open-ended freedom to legislate enjoyed by this session.

I don't think theoretically the possibility to repeal everything from 2016 until today should be there.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

The thing about it is that the right can also mass repeal laws that were passed during a left wing majority.

The act does not outlaw repealing, it just limits mass repealing in one act.

Any bill that seeks to repeal two (2) or more federal laws adopted after June 1, 2016 in the same bill

shall not be brought to a final vote without a two-thirds vote of the whole Senate

I personally don't see the issue, get the two thirds vote i guess if they are common sense repealing?

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Switching to abstain on the first one and voting abstain on Mr. R’s amendment

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Changing to Nay on WB's amendment and Aye on R's amendment.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Aye

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Changing to abstain