Is Australia still a liberal democracy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 09:46:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Is Australia still a liberal democracy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is still Australia still a liberal democracy?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 64

Author Topic: Is Australia still a liberal democracy?  (Read 1022 times)
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,590
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
« on: January 12, 2022, 12:52:16 AM »

Seriously, isn't it a rule 101 of politics that "liberal democracies" can still do highly illiberal things?

This. And people have to start knowing that, because some "liberal democracies" are more illiberal than literal dictatorships.

Like you can literally have a liberal democracy and carry on a genocide if the genocide has a majority of the popular support and if the separation of power fails to prevent such things, like agree with the genocide...

Technically you can have fair & free elections... if the people agree with the genocide.
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,590
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2022, 03:54:39 AM »

Seriously, isn't it a rule 101 of politics that "liberal democracies" can still do highly illiberal things?

This. And people have to start knowing that, because some "liberal democracies" are more illiberal than literal dictatorships.

Like you can literally have a liberal democracy and carry on a genocide if the genocide has a majority of the popular support and if the separation of power fails to prevent such things, like agree with the genocide...

Technically you can have fair & free elections... if the people agree with the genocide.

It's incredibly offensive to compare a policy that's about saving lives to genocide.

I don't care about what it is offensive, i care about making the point, and you know very well that my point is valid. Replace with genocide with anything else, and it still says, it has nothing to do with genocide, but yes given that you have no insightful criticism on what i make, you deviate the attention to something else which is irrelevant.

It is exactly this kind of behaviour that is responsible for 21st century increase of polarization.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.