Two of the biggest Trump derangement syndrome sufferers write a hit piece against Trump in the Jeff Bezos blog, a publication notorious for its serial fake news stories attacking Trump. Do you have anything from a credible source.
Everything you people don't like is fake news. That's the real derangement syndrome.
I'm not going to get into an argument about where the term "fake news" originated. That's not even close to the discussion here, so I won't engage with you on that--I don't understand why you brought it up, unless it was to detract from the fact you just don't have a good counterargument for my point that you guys label everything as "fake news" if it isn't pro-Trump.
Is there is any legitimate piece of media or news that has reported facts about Trump which have been seen negatively that you do not consider to be fake news? Plenty of people have a habit of labelling news stories they don't like as 'fake news' because they don't like the source, for example plenty of liberals are reacting exactly that way to the problem recent Project Veritas story. I'm pointing out that that kind of thing goes both ways.
As for criticisms of Trump there are plenty of things to criticise him on, his failure to get work started on the wall, his failure to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem yet etc etc. There's plenty of good reasons to criticise him.
Frankly I don't understand how you can be so oblivious to all the evidence that this is a cooked up political witch hunt. Obviously cooked up political witch hunts do happen and there is plenty of evidence that this is one of them. What exactly would it take for you to start to suspect that that is what's going on here?
Seriously. Let's look at the evidence. The FBI's total reliance on the dodgy Crowdstrike report and its complete failure to examine the DNC servers to verify any of Crowdstrike's claims. The reliance on a clearly fake dossier cooked up at the request of a Dem linked opposed research company. The ever expanding investigation run by a close friend of one of the key witnesses (in a total and clear conflict of interest) branching out in every direction because the original Trump/Russia interference/collusion story is falling apart for lack of credible evidence.
Seriously. At what point would you start to think 'this is looking less like evidence against Trump and more like evidence of a partisan witch hunt'. What would it take for you to start considering that possibility.
