HB 22-02: Federal Assault Weapon and Automatic Weapon Ban Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 04:41:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HB 22-02: Federal Assault Weapon and Automatic Weapon Ban Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HB 22-02: Federal Assault Weapon and Automatic Weapon Ban Act (Passed)  (Read 4770 times)
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« on: January 09, 2020, 11:52:23 AM »
« edited: January 10, 2020, 03:45:50 PM by Representative ReaganClinton »

Quote
Federal Assault Weapon and Automatic Weapon Ban Act

SECTION I: NAME

1. This bill may be cited as the Federal Assault Weapon and Automatic Weapon Ban Act.
2. This bill may, in short, be cited as the Assault Weapon Ban Act.

SECTION II: ASSAULT WEAPON BAN

1. There shall be a nationwide ban on the purchasing, sale, or possession of assualt weapons, these weapons include semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns, which can accept detachable magazines, as well as revolving cylindrical shotguns.

2. Any weapon that is purchased, sold, or possessed may not have a folding or collapsible stock, a bayonet lug, a threaded barrel, a grenade launcher, or a barrel shroud.

SECTION III: AUTOMATIC WEAPON BAN

1. There shall be a ban on the purchasing, sale, or possession of fully automatic weapons, also known as Title II weapons under the National Firearms Act.

SECTION IV: TIMING

1. This bill shall take effect, one week six months after being signed by the President.

An amendment, there needs to be a longer timeframe to prevent complications. Otherwise I'm on board.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2020, 01:51:58 PM »

Nay
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2020, 06:29:51 PM »

Nay, the limit isn’t necessary.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2020, 10:23:52 AM »

Nay, I'd like to see where this goes
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2020, 08:38:36 AM »

Abstain
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2020, 05:14:26 PM »

Aye
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2020, 06:24:23 PM »

I’ve determined that I will be switching my vote to Nay, re-reading this it needs some work. Still agree with the general concept, just needs a bit more.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2020, 01:15:52 AM »

I’ve determined that I will be switching my vote to Nay, re-reading this it needs some work. Still agree with the general concept, just needs a bit more.
Susan Collins
Go back to the court windjammer, I just want it to be the best the first time we pass it.

Also, I'm more of a Mitt Romney guy myself.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2020, 09:10:52 PM »

re-reading this it needs some work. Still agree with the general concept, just needs a bit more.

I agree with RC's vague concerns, but I feel like he meant to vote "abstain." Anyway I'll cancel that out and vote aye!

And I trust the Senate--including the recently-elected member from my own region!--to improve the substance of this bill and get us something we can all agree with! Smiley

RIP Sensible and independent thinking Leinad

Oh wow, Leinad thinks my statements are vague even though I just want everything in the bill to be crystal clear, and even tho he agrees he’ll vote to advance a bill that’ll potentially come back around in a year with imperfections. Classic old man yells at cloud moment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 10 queries.