absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 10:03:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 115114 times)
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


« Reply #75 on: November 07, 2016, 09:34:37 PM »

Ok you are just making up numbers. Troll. There is no way every single poll in both states show her with a double digit lead.

As I explained to you in the other thread: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=249803.0

where did you get theses numbers? source?

I have separate posts with links for all of these polls earlier in this thread.

So if you don't believe me, by all means double check the numbers yourself.

Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


« Reply #76 on: November 07, 2016, 09:39:27 PM »

Ok you are just making up numbers. Troll. There is no way every single poll in both states show her with a double digit lead.

If you look closely, some of them are single-digit leads.

GeorgiaModerate, sorry if my earlier reply seemed a little brusque-- I thought you were replying to me, not RalstonSucks!
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


« Reply #77 on: November 08, 2016, 04:06:32 AM »
« Edited: November 08, 2016, 04:25:33 AM by Ozymandias »

COLORADO polling of early voting summary

Presented from most-to-least percent of Early Voters (EV), with absolute number of EV (which can be used as a proxy for MOE) in parentheses:

PPP: 73% (514 EV)-- Clinton +11 (52-41)

Keating: 68% (414 EV)-- Clinton +4 (44-40)

Magellan: 64% (322 EV)-- Clinton +6 (46-40)

Denver Post: 54% (300 EV)-- Clinton +17 (53-36)

YouGov: 28% (279 EV)-- Clinton +18 (55-37)


There's a lot more variance in Clinton's polled EV leads in Colorado (though note that Trump's share is always between 36-41), but I think it's reasonable to assume that Clinton has at least a 6-pt lead among the 77% of the voters who have already voted (based on total 2012 vote).
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


« Reply #78 on: November 08, 2016, 04:27:55 AM »

IOWA polling of early voting summary

Presented from most-to-least percent of Early Voters (EV), with absolute number of EV (which can be used as a proxy for MOE) in parentheses:

Emerson: 37% (262 EV)-- Clinton +23 (57-34)

Selzer: 34% (272 EV)-- Clinton +22 (53-31)

Loras: 26% (131 EV)-- Clinton +28 (57-29)

Quinnipiac: 21% (166 EV)-- Clinton +34 (61-27)


So even though Democratic early vote share is down vs. 2012, and Clinton is behind in most Iowa polls, she actually appears to have at least a 20% lead among the 40% of voters who have already voted  (based on total 2012 vote).

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.