The FBI is out of control (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 07:40:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The FBI is out of control (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The FBI is out of control  (Read 2564 times)
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« on: November 05, 2016, 09:25:58 AM »

Clinton got 55% of the D vote because voters knew that all of the "scandals" invented against her are bullsh[Inks].
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2016, 10:49:57 AM »

Clinton got 55% of the D vote because voters knew that all of the "scandals" invented against her are bullsh[Inks].

Pretty much that and that any candidate is going to have scandals even if they were Jesus. The Republican Media can make anything into a Watergate or a Nurenburg.  There was already an oppo hit about Bernie buying a $600,000 vacation home. That could have sunk him because what would a socialist be doing with even a modestly extravagant  half million dollar home?

Then again, the Clintons just crank people up. Something about them just makes Republicans lose their fuggin' minds even when they bend over backwards more than any other major Democrat for them (at least amongst those who soon aren't going to change parties).

So two things. There would have been scandals no matter what. But I voted for Bernie in the primaries because beyond the center-left, no one likes the Clintons.
I think the Republicans are just scared about Clinton lending a good name to the Democratically party. They need to create the illusion that neither side wants to get anything done, but when you have someone who is openly willing to work across the aisle in the WH, that gets a lot harder.
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2016, 02:03:29 PM »

Personal responsibility. Thy name is NEVER Democrat.

Blaming the FBI for reopening an investigation when 650,000 e-mails are unearthed is like a fat person blaming McDonalds for their obesity.

Hillary Clinton is the only one responsible for all of this.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to host a private e-mail server for official government correspondences.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to delete 33,000 e-mails when served with a subpoena.

And it certainly was not the FBI's idea to have your top assistant sync your server on the computer she shared with her perverted pedophile husband.

I'm sorry, Hillary deserves 1000% of the fallout she has wrought here. This was a self-inflicted and wholly unnecessary string of decisions on her part.

The blame that we're here, at a place where America may well elect someone guilty of a felony committed while in high office, doesn't rest squarely on Hillary; it also rests on those donors, who funded her campaign knowing she was under investigations, and on the DNC, which cleared the path for her, running off all Democratic challengers, leaving Bernie Sanders (an Independent) to be the only challenger to Clinton.

Martin O'Malley would be beating Trump.
So tell me- what do those donors see in Hillary that they didn't in Webb or Chafee? And since when did three emails equal 650,000?
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2016, 02:24:23 PM »

Personal responsibility. Thy name is NEVER Democrat.

Blaming the FBI for reopening an investigation when 650,000 e-mails are unearthed is like a fat person blaming McDonalds for their obesity.

Hillary Clinton is the only one responsible for all of this.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to host a private e-mail server for official government correspondences.

It wasn't the FBI's bright idea to delete 33,000 e-mails when served with a subpoena.

And it certainly was not the FBI's idea to have your top assistant sync your server on the computer she shared with her perverted pedophile husband.

I'm sorry, Hillary deserves 1000% of the fallout she has wrought here. This was a self-inflicted and wholly unnecessary string of decisions on her part.

The blame that we're here, at a place where America may well elect someone guilty of a felony committed while in high office, doesn't rest squarely on Hillary; it also rests on those donors, who funded her campaign knowing she was under investigations, and on the DNC, which cleared the path for her, running off all Democratic challengers, leaving Bernie Sanders (an Independent) to be the only challenger to Clinton.

Martin O'Malley would be beating Trump.
So tell me- what do those donors see in Hillary that they didn't in Webb or Chafee? And since when did three emails equal 650,000?

That's a good question.

A better question would be this:  What did those donors see in Hillary that they didn't see in Joe Biden, Amy Klobuchar, Debbie Stabenow, Claire McCaskill, Brian Schweitzer, Chuck Schumer, et al?  That's a good question to ask in light of what we now know about the Clinton Foundation and how it operates.

Is there a relationship between Clinton Foundation "Pay to Play" and Joe Biden, et al, opting out of the race?  You tell me.
Please direct me to evidence (actual, real evidence) of Clinton paying off the DNC. Come on. I'm dying to see it.
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2016, 05:21:20 PM »


Giuliani on Fox and Friends:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Giuliani later that day on CNN:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/04/politics/rudy-giuliani-hillary-clinton-email-fbi/index.html

lol, such a liar
(cue Trumpistas whining about how these prove that Hillary Clinton is murdering the entire white population of Iowa to rig the election)
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2016, 07:47:51 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/04/fox-news-apologizes-clinton-report/93300254/

So conservatives are just fine with the FBI leaking lies right before an election to manipulate the election?  

Perhaps someday in the future the FBI or Justice Department will start leaking negative information about investigations into Republican candidates right before an election.  How much will you like it then?

I'll say this again:  This is the occupational hazard you endure when you knowingly nominate a candidate under FBI investigation.

I'll also say this:  Bret Baier apologized and clarified.  Dan Rather can't say the same.
When you've been in the public eye for 24+ years, and you've had Republicans trying to topple you the whole time, exactly how are you going to avoid something going to the FBI?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.