What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 08:11:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What do you think would have happened in 1992 without Perot?  (Read 3563 times)
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
« on: May 21, 2017, 06:08:11 PM »
The only states that definitely would have flipped to Bush are Montana, Nevada, Colorado, New Hampshire. I know GA was the closest state that year, but Perot did not do well in the South so not sure how much of an impact it would have made. I also think Clinton would have kept Ohio and New Jersey.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.