Johnson Says He Will Appoint Justices Like Breyer and Garland (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 07:23:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Johnson Says He Will Appoint Justices Like Breyer and Garland (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Johnson Says He Will Appoint Justices Like Breyer and Garland  (Read 2504 times)
cMac36
Rookie
**
Posts: 174
« on: July 31, 2016, 09:39:15 PM »

It's funny it does seem that much of Johnson's vote is disaffected Bernie supporters rather than disgruntled conservatives except in Utah area.  Probably a pander.  Kind of Goofy.  Has Breyer been Libertarian-friendly on Commerce Clause??  That is what they care about most not social issues
Logged
cMac36
Rookie
**
Posts: 174
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 09:41:59 PM »

Also, both Pauls are pro-life.

You should be ashamed.

Do the Pauls support Federal regulation of abortion or just repeal of Roe v Wade, and then state-by-state laws?
Logged
cMac36
Rookie
**
Posts: 174
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2016, 09:58:36 PM »

It's the neo-libertarian way. Self-centered ideology.

Individualist ideology.  I don't like central planning, groupthink, etc.  "A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

For abortion: I rather not kill a fetus if necessary, because non-aggression principle.  But there are some extenuating circumstances that mitigate that. I'm not a part of that conversation because it doesn't affect me personally.

Well I mean man what is politics but to take positions on issues that affect the society?
Logged
cMac36
Rookie
**
Posts: 174
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2016, 10:04:33 PM »

It's the neo-libertarian way. Self-centered ideology.

Individualist ideology.  I don't like central planning, groupthink, etc.  "A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

For abortion: I rather not kill a fetus if necessary, because non-aggression principle.  But there are some extenuating circumstances that mitigate that. I'm not a part of that conversation because it doesn't affect me personally.

Well I mean man what is politics but to take positions on issues that affect the society?

OK, but you have issues that are more important to you, right? Issues that affect you or people in your life directly? Sure you do, and you're lying if you say you don't.  Abortion is just way down the totem pole for me.

Yeah but I don't draw a straight line with the impacts me is therefore important.  I guess that's because I have enough money to live etc obviously if I was poor pensioner I would be fixated on Social Security.  The way you wrote it is, not effect you you don't care which isn't the case for most people who would have these convos on their free time.  Whether you care about abortion or not is something only you can answer obviously.  I don't care about guns for example/
Logged
cMac36
Rookie
**
Posts: 174
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2016, 01:06:26 PM »

This is what I was afraid of: he is going for Hillary vote, not for Trump.

No Fear you realize Hillary is big favorite right?  Go look at Bookmakers' Odds.  How does Trump win states like PA where he gets outspent 15-1 or OH where the State Republican Party (Kasich-loyallists) is not for him?

Clinton biggest favorite at this stage of game since Reagan '84.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.