OwlRhetoric
Jr. Member
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 298
![](./avatars/Independent/I_MN.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: August 28, 2016, 01:31:48 PM » |
|
No to both. I don't believe in invalidating the votes of the primary voters. There are a few states where you can legit argue they have crappy Byzantine systems designed to bamboozle the voters in favor of party insiders. I also say the caucus system is a huge pain that should be reformed/abolished altogether in favor of regular primary ballot voting. For the rest of the country, I don't buy the argument that it's a problem both nominees were selected by about 10-20% of voters, or whatever the figure is. If most GE voters are too lazy/unengaged to participate in the primaries, that's their problem.
|