Right gangs make the world so much safer for women right? At least she didn't plagiarize a speech or foot tap in a bathroom stall. Mitt Romney couldn't even give his dog a bath without a 10 minute smear from the mainstream media yet Clinton gets away with supporting gangs and not protecting information that would've saved many lives.
That is not how analogies work. Analogies do not imply that the things being compared are identical in every way. You must know that, being a human being who's competent enough to start up a computer and login to an internet forum.
Presidential years here are the worst.
Gangs don't make the world safer for women. You're right though joining a gang would be worse than giving a dog a bath or foot tapping in a stall especially when you just can't get it to come out. So perhaps what she implied was worse. Below I read the argument that she implied those who join gangs are looking to make up for the lack of a family. That's very true but doesn't get explained in a 30 second ad the way her sentence does. You're also right about election years being more partisan. I think you said that's the case here as I'm sure is the case everywhere. In politics you get taken out of context. Mitt Romney said "I like being able to fire people" but only in the context of firing those who provide poor healthcare services. He was simply saying that we should have the right to choose our doctors and insurers. This is unfortunate but I wouldn't be on this site if I didn't enjoy it on some level and I believe it's the same for you? This site seems pretty good so far.
