SB 29-18: Sticking a Middle Finger to Big Brother Act (Amended Version Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 12:04:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 29-18: Sticking a Middle Finger to Big Brother Act (Amended Version Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 29-18: Sticking a Middle Finger to Big Brother Act (Amended Version Passed)  (Read 1392 times)
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,190


« on: April 16, 2021, 03:56:16 AM »

Why was the curfew amendment struck originally?
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,190


« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2021, 05:31:37 PM »

I'd like more information on whether facial recognition is a valid law enforcement tool, and am not comfortable with the bill yet. It may be wiser to have a regulated system where law enforcement can use it to help solve crimes and protect the public.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,190


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2021, 04:39:18 AM »

I'd like more information on whether facial recognition is a valid law enforcement tool, and am not comfortable with the bill yet. It may be wiser to have a regulated system where law enforcement can use it to help solve crimes and protect the public.

One of the main problems with using facial recognition cameras as a law enforcement tool is that is has been scientifically proven these cameras are more prone to misidentify people of color, possibly leading to many in minority groups being arrested for crimes they didn't commit. This is also a technology that could be abused by local jurisdictions, such as tracking down people for minor petty crimes and keeping constant surveillance of citizens, through what is a deeply invasive tactic.

The technology should be improved but the benefits may still outweigh the risks. I'm not sure if we will be able to write up a good set of regulations ourselves, perhaps we could create a non-playable commission that would provide new regulations. One obvious regulation would be setting a mandatory very high confidence setting in the technology for law enforcement. There also appear to have been beneficial uses of it for medical purposes. My worry is that a total ban would be an overreaction since any new technology can make people uncomfortable, but most still benefit society.  I do agree that we don't want this technology being abused to create a kind of Big Brother surveillance state.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,190


« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2021, 02:50:29 PM »

Abstain
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.