Why is Oklahoma so hostile to third parties? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 03:13:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why is Oklahoma so hostile to third parties? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is Oklahoma so hostile to third parties?  (Read 1210 times)
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« on: April 20, 2014, 03:25:42 PM »

They wouldn't let Teddy Roosevelt on the ballot in 1912, or Ralph Nader in 2000, so they appear to always have had very restrictive ballot access laws. The only reason Debs did so well there in 1912 was protest votes from people who would have voted for TR.

Somehow John Anderson was able to qualify in 1980, even then he only got 3.3%, as opposed to 6.6% nationally, although he was weak throughout the South.

In 1948 both Wallace and Thurmond weren't on the ballot, but Norman Thomas made it in 1936 while Lemke didn't.

Now as to why the laws are so restrictive, I have no idea.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.