BREAKING: Appeals court denies Trump administration request to reinstate ban (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:26:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  BREAKING: Appeals court denies Trump administration request to reinstate ban (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: BREAKING: Appeals court denies Trump administration request to reinstate ban  (Read 7441 times)
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« on: February 09, 2017, 07:53:37 PM »
Quote from: Reaganfan on February 09, 2017, 07:45:36 PM
The Constitution is extremely clear that the President of the United States has the authority to do these things in the interests of national security.

Period. That isn't debatable. Remember, the Constitution is not an evolving document.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA, conservatives arguing for unchecked executive power?! F**k this is gold.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2017, 07:54:35 PM »
Quote from: DavidB. on February 09, 2017, 07:53:50 PM
The constitution is p boring imo. Let's make politics a little bit more exciting!
Bring back the camps
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2017, 08:00:03 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2017, 08:06:02 PM by Devout Centrist »
It would be "interesting" to intern foreign aliens though. Internment camps or bust!
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2017, 08:14:58 PM »
Quote from: Reaganfan on February 09, 2017, 08:13:11 PM
Quote from: MaxQue on February 09, 2017, 07:51:56 PM
Quote from: Reaganfan on February 09, 2017, 07:45:36 PM
The Constitution is extremely clear that the President of the United States has the authority to do these things in the interests of national security.

Period. That isn't debatable. Remember, the Constitution is not an evolving document.

I think it's why they are judges and not you.

They understand law, and you don't. It's simple as that.

Trump is free to ask Congress to pass laws or to start the process for a constituonnal amendment, however.

It's about activist judges trying like mad to find ways around the Constitution. It really seems to me, and maybe I'm not right, I don't know, but it seems to me that liberal judges are always frantic to find ways around the Constitution.

Why?
Were the judges who placed an injunction on Obama's EO "activist"?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.