Monmouth Poll: Clinton +4 in Ohio

[Devout Centrist]

It seems like there's some controversy over the methodology here.

Monmouth's unweighed poll - results being results, which red avatars preach on here....
33R/29D/36I. Trump with a 2-point lead.

After Monmouth's special sauce was added, it became
29R/33D/37I. Clinton leading by 4.

Monmouth claims that the poll was reweighed for region, sex, race, age and polling vote history/registration. Their critics claim otherwise.

I'll be honest, I don't see how you can get to an 8% shift in the electorate by adjusting for race an age.

You'd think polling vote history/registration would be baked into the LV screen to begin with and would not need adjustment.

I think race was off by a few points, age a few points as well.

Sex seems to be on par between the weighted and unweighted samples.

It's possible it's a regional thing, which isn't released in the results.

2004 was rigged!

[Devout Centrist]

It's always hilarious when Atlas posters think they are experts at polling, when in fact most people here couldn't conduct a poll if their life depended on it.

Aw, I just started a poll with my shell company, "DC Polling." Here's a sample question:

"TN Volunteer hates women! Do you think he's good for the women of New Hampshire?"