Poll: Are you smarter than the FBI? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 05:00:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Poll: Are you smarter than the FBI? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Just want to find out who the legal experts on here are if I end up in trouble
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 62

Author Topic: Poll: Are you smarter than the FBI?  (Read 1255 times)
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,160
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« on: July 06, 2016, 05:09:43 AM »

Shill!
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,160
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2016, 05:31:50 AM »

They admitted she comitted gross negligence and then refused to indict her. They essentially laid out the evidence-outside of court-convicting her of a felony, and then said she should not be prosecuted. That in itself is the FBI comitting a felony. If they did not believe that she should be indicted, then they shouldn't have presented the evidence and stated she had comitted a felony.

If this is incorrect, can somebody correct me?
Why didn't a Republican recommend charges for her? Bribery? Corruption? Internal government threats?

None of these accusations have basis in reality and it's part of the reason I can't vote for national Republican candidates anymore.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,160
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2016, 05:42:03 AM »

They admitted she comitted gross negligence and then refused to indict her. They essentially laid out the evidence-outside of court-convicting her of a felony, and then said she should not be prosecuted. That in itself is the FBI comitting a felony. If they did not believe that she should be indicted, then they shouldn't have presented the evidence and stated she had comitted a felony.

If this is incorrect, can somebody correct me?
Why didn't a Republican recommend charges for her? Bribery? Corruption? Internal government threats?

None of these accusations have basis in reality and it's part of the reason I can't vote for national Republican candidates anymore.

They do have basis in reality. They did find that she lied about her emails and that they did contain confidential information. They chose not to pursue it because she didn't *intend* harm in doing what she did. This does not mean she is innocent and not responsible for any wrongdoing. They just chose not to file any charges.
Alright, please present the evidence that Comey was bribed or threatened.

I'll wait.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,160
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2016, 05:51:31 AM »

They admitted she comitted gross negligence and then refused to indict her. They essentially laid out the evidence-outside of court-convicting her of a felony, and then said she should not be prosecuted. That in itself is the FBI comitting a felony. If they did not believe that she should be indicted, then they shouldn't have presented the evidence and stated she had comitted a felony.

If this is incorrect, can somebody correct me?
Why didn't a Republican recommend charges for her? Bribery? Corruption? Internal government threats?

None of these accusations have basis in reality and it's part of the reason I can't vote for national Republican candidates anymore.

They do have basis in reality. They did find that she lied about her emails and that they did contain confidential information. They chose not to pursue it because she didn't *intend* harm in doing what she did. This does not mean she is innocent and not responsible for any wrongdoing. They just chose not to file any charges.
Alright, please present the evidence that Comey was bribed or threatened.

I'll wait.

I never stated that Comey was bribed or threatened.

If you choose to ignore FACTS from the investigation that's on you.
You just said, "these accusations are based in reality," and then refuse to provide evidence that Comey was either bribed or threatened. Which was my initial claim.

So they are baseless. Thanks.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 15 queries.