(Democrats) obstructionism and hypocrisy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 06:28:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  (Democrats) obstructionism and hypocrisy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: (Democrats) obstructionism and hypocrisy  (Read 2689 times)
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


« on: January 31, 2017, 02:42:55 PM »

Democrats are in a pickle, but I think the choice is clear. Obstruct.

Who cares if we look like hypocrites. Republicans set this disgusting precedent, and now they'll have to live with it until both Democrats and Republicans can come together and start compromising again.

Things are going to get really f-ing ugly before they start to get better.
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2017, 06:35:02 PM »

Democrats are in a pickle, but I think the choice is clear. Obstruct.

Who cares if we look like hypocrites. Republicans set this disgusting precedent, and now they'll have to live with it until both Democrats and Republicans can come together and start compromising again.

Things are going to get really f-ing ugly before they start to get better.


I agree. Frankly, the Republicans do not have any right to talk here about the Dems obstructing anything. They already set the example so suck it in, Reps.

Just remember this in 8 years when its back to GOP obstruction.

We will.

It'll be a never-ending cycle until our situation becomes untenable.
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2017, 12:15:49 AM »

So in a hypothetical future where Trump is reelected, the Senate has 56 Republicans, and the filibuster hasn't been nuked, is it ok for the Democrats to keep filibustering for a full 8 years? Because if your answer is yes, then the Republicans must not have done anything wrong in refusing to consider Garland.

Democrats shouldn't filibuster in that situation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.