Trump approval ratings thread 1.2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 08:53:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump approval ratings thread 1.2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump approval ratings thread 1.2  (Read 186680 times)
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« on: October 28, 2017, 07:42:29 PM »


Cheesy
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2017, 12:20:25 PM »

WaPo/ABC (vs. Sept.)

Approve: 37% (-2) (strong: 25%)
Disapprove: 59% (+2) (strong: 50%)

He was at 36% approval in July, but this is a new high for disapproval. Needless to say, this is the worst result of any president in his first year in history.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/year-surprise-election-65-percent-trumps-achieved-poll/story?id=50907926

Wow...strongly disapprove @ 50%. That's the highest I've seen yet.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2017, 07:39:54 PM »

Alabama-Fox News:
Source

Registered voters
17. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald
Trump is doing as president?

NET: APPROVE 53%
NET: DISAPPROVE 45%

(Among likely voters, it's 52-47)
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2017, 02:29:09 PM »

ARG, Nov. 17-20,
Source

Approve: 35%
Disapprove: 61%
Undecided: 4%

Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2017, 10:37:22 AM »


I ask nicely can you please troll better. Thank you.

Anyways, 8 points is horrible for Trump, lol.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2017, 08:31:15 PM »

At this point, it wouldn't surprise me if he is underwater (or at least very close to it) in MS at the moment.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2017, 09:21:19 PM »

https://twitter.com/politico_chris/status/944007367049515008

The tweet reads: "Trump Job Approval in the South vs. his 2016 result in parentheses:
AR- 48% (61%)
LA- 48% (58%)
MS- 51% (58%)
AL- 53% (62%)
GA- 47% (50%)
SC- 51% (55%)
FL- 42% (49%)
NC- 43% (52%)
VA- 39% (44%)
WV- 59% (68%)
KY- 50% (63%)
MO- 48% (56%)
TX- 45% (52%)
OK- 56% (65%)
TN- 51% (61%)"

I don't know what he's sourcing or if there's any new info here, however I would like to point out that GA only has a paltry 3% shift away from Trump while TX shifted away by 7% and AR did by 13%

Bad numbers. Some of these states are some of the most inelastic in the nation. Could produce some really interesting results in the next couple of years.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2017, 01:39:16 PM »

Gallup, 12/26 (change from 12/23 -- no polling on 12/24-25)

Approve 38 (-1)
Disapprove 56 (+1)
I'm loving this tax reform bump.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2017, 03:42:57 PM »

Yes, but it's supposed to be a balance.  The weight of a number of votes in heavily populated states vs people's wants getting ignored in sparsely populated ones.  If we were on pure vote count, why should people in Wyoming or Delaware or Rhode Island even bother voting in a national election? The electoral college isn't perfect and maybe we could tweak it some, but it's still better than just a raw count.

Every other Western democracy uses popular vote and they are doing just fine, thank you.

And to add to this, individual states here in this nation are using the popular vote as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.